male,female,mars,venus......
This has been a topic in my mind for a long time, ever since I learnt the meaning of the word feminism. Or rather, the meaning that it has aquired over the years. Beer's post triggered it up again and serves as inspiration for this post. For long, this word has been used synonomously with celebration of womenhood and equality among the two sexes. Somewhere along the line though, I feel that the movement lost a little objectivity. Anyone who uses this term or way of life as some call it, with respect to social issues like female infanticide or dowry or matrimonial terrorizing, has my complete support and sympathy. It's not the same though, when you address issues such as pressure cooker and washing machine commercials and women. A while ago, there was this huge uproar about the objectification of women and how we sell everything from beer to toothpaste to condoms using female models. Objectification- that's a tough word, one which has almost exclusively been used as what a man does with respect to women. That's a pretty strong accusation, if you ask me. Why is the male animal alone accused of such a crime. I write animal specifically, because I think it is very pertinant. Objectification of the sexes, fair and otherwise, is to a certain extent a biological process. The peahen chooses the peacock with the prettiest plumage. And a host of other species do it too. As a rule, when men objectify women, the criteria become a lot more physical. Isnt that a biological concept too? It's the way male and female bodies are supposed to function. I am not advocating full fledged male adoration of the female body. That's where your brain is supposed to kick in. After the initial pheromone rush. Thats' when you balance out the physical objectification with other characterstics which contribute to the woman as a whole.
Women do it too. Maybe our criteria are less physical. But they can be just as sexist. Infact our basis of selectivity is more set in stone. I personally believe that the average intelligent man can look beyond the physical aspect.
Again, this is not to say that I'm endorsing complete sexual objectification of either ofthe sexes. As for everything else, soceity has norms and limits. That is what I think the key issue is. Limits. Those decided by society, and more personally, by individuals. Limits, which can be as varied as possible depending on the sensibilities of all the individuals involved.
I might have digressed. I might have even gone completely against the norm and become anti feminist.(what is the opposite of a feminist? masculinist?)
The last line is this though. Let's not get too mired in deciding who the stronger sex is, in establishing equality in every single which way.
Man and woman were created differently. For a reason. And I dont just mean procreation. I'd rather embrace the differences and enjoy them.
